Publications

The claimant sustained a work injury in 1982, and because of its age and the time that had passed from prior litigation, no documentation existed about the claim. What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 27, No.

NEWS RESULTS* What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 27, No.

The Supreme Court of Delaware holds that an employer or a workers’ compensation carrier may assert a subrogation lien against an employee’s recovery of benefits under an employer-purchased UIM policy, overruling its own precedent in Simendinge What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 27, No.

The claimant, shot by unknown assailant while walking between his employer’s locations, did not meet his burden of proof. However, the District Court certified the below question to the Supreme Court for further clarification. What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 27, No.

Since the last update on various pending New Jersey workers’ compensation legislation, there has been an update and new proposed legislation as outlined below.  What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 27, No.

An employer does not admit liability for a work injury with a late answer to a Claim Petition where the injury is not well pled.  What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 27, No.

The claimant’s January 2018 email failed to prove notice under § 312. What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 27, No.

NEWS RESULTS* What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 27, No.

Ms. Taylor was injured in a compensable work accident on September 16, 2016. The injury later developed into Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) involving her right arm and right leg. What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 27, No.

The claimant, a law-enforcement officer, was hired in 2004 after undergoing a pre-employment physical. In 2008, he sought care with his primary care physician and was diagnosed with hypertension. What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 27, No.