.png)
Publications
Circuit Court of Appeals finds Fla. Stat. § 627.70132 does not require notice of a supplemental claim to include an estimate of damages.
In this unpublished opinion, the Eleventh Circuit was presented with the issue of whether Florida Statute § 627.70132 required the insured’s notice of a supplemental claim to its insurance carrier include an estimate of damages.
Legal Update for Florida Coverage & Property Litigation – June 2024 is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent legal develo
Third District Court quashes order granting motion for protective order relating to a corporate representative’s deposition.
The petitioner in this matter (the plaintiff below) sought certiorari review of a discovery order granting a motion for protective order filed below by the defendant.
Legal Update for Florida Coverage & Property Litigation – June 2024 is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent legal develo
On the Pulse…Defense Verdicts and Successful Litigation Results*
CASUALTY DEPARTMENT
HEALTH CARE DEPARTMENT
PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY DEPARTMENT
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION DEPARTMENT
Defense Digest, Vol. 30, No.
Superior Court affirms IAB decision enforcing workers’ compensation settlement agreement and rejected claimant’s attorney’s argument of entitlement to common law “attorney’s charging lien” that was not a term of the settlement.
Mr. Webb workers’ compensation claim was denied, and he filed a petition with the Industrial Accident Board that sought acknowledgment of the accident, medical expense benefits and temporary total disability (TTD) benefits. Mr.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 28, No.
A judge of compensation claims must be specific when awarding non-professional attendant care to a family member.
The claimant petitioned for attendant care benefits to be paid to her husband. The judge of compensation claimant ordered the employer/carrier to pay him for 30 hours per week at the federal minimum wage.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 28, No.
The Appellate Division reversed and remanded a trial court order denying the plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint and dismissed their matter with prejudice.
The plaintiffs had filed a complaint for survival and wrongful death against the defendants, asserting the defendants caused the decedents to become infected with COVID-19 and pass away in March 2020.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 28, No.
Appellate Division finds that compulsion in an activity could render it a non-social or recreational activity.
The petitioner had worked for the respondent since 2007. On December 14, 2013, he reported for mandatory snow duty and as a result, he had to stay at the assigned Marriott Hotel for 12 hours and work the other 12 hours.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 28, No.
Pharmacy staffed by pharmacist provided by an employee leasing agency is a provider as defined by Section 109 of the Act. When a physician has ownership interest in said pharmacy, a referral to the pharmacy violates the Act’s self-referral prohibition.
In this case, 700 Pharmacy filed five Fee Review Applications for prescriptions for the claimant. The Hearing Officer dismissed all of the applications on the grounds of an illegal self-referral.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 28, No.
What’s Hot In Workers’ Comp - News and Results*
NEWS
RESULTS*
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 28, No.
Defense Digest 2023-Present
Defense Digest, Vol. 30, No. 2, June 2024
Defense Digest, Vol. 30, No. 1, March 2024